We have one secretary in our office (or administrative assistant if you want to be PC) and she's also the only woman in our company. This is the same woman I've complained about who's always asking for money for her son's many extra-curricular activities. Well today I find out it's secretary's day so now I have to chip in $20 for a gift. This is beside the fact that she doesn't do anything for me. I have to admit, at first I refused. I've already given $20 for her Christmas present and $20 for her birthday present and now I have to chip in for secretary's day? Is it not enough that she gets an entire bathroom all to herself? I guarantee, if she was a man she wouldn't get anything extra. She already gets a year end bonus, why do we employees have to throw in extra for her? Hell her bonus was higher than mine and I'm a manager. I would venture to say that I help her more than she helps me. She doesn't know how to do anything with the computer and she's very quick to pass the buck whenever she can. It really irks me that I have to pay my own hard earned money on someone who will barely give me a thank you but then again, if I'm the only one who rocks the boat then I'm the asshole in everyone's eyes. She's getting a $120 gift certificate for secretary's f'ing day. That's ridiculous.
Wednesday, April 26, 2006
Wednesday, April 12, 2006
A friend of mine is thinking of running the Boston Marathon next week with no training. He's run the race in the past so this wouldn't be his first time but it would be his first time with no training. He's the type of guy who gets pleasure out of testing his limits. He's also thinking about bringing his blackberry along for the run and blogging about the experience as the race progresses. The only thing holding him back is his fear of a long term injury given that he's had knee problems in the past.
One thing I find annoying about marathons is all the people who brag about having run a marathon and then you find out they walked half the distance. No you didn't run a marathon, you ran 12 miles. There's a big difference. In fact, I think the organizers of these marathons should have a reasonable cut off time where they close the course off if you haven't made it to a certain point. This would at least maintain the integrity of the race.
My wife took part in two short triathlons last year. The swim portion (which comes first) was fairly short - maybe a quarter mile at best. I was amazed at how many people couldn't even finish that portion. There were lifeguards all over rendering assistance. One race participant actually had a snorkel, mask and flippers and he was allowed to compete. Everyone got a medal once the race was over. It's like this is the special olympics or something.
One thing I find annoying about marathons is all the people who brag about having run a marathon and then you find out they walked half the distance. No you didn't run a marathon, you ran 12 miles. There's a big difference. In fact, I think the organizers of these marathons should have a reasonable cut off time where they close the course off if you haven't made it to a certain point. This would at least maintain the integrity of the race.
My wife took part in two short triathlons last year. The swim portion (which comes first) was fairly short - maybe a quarter mile at best. I was amazed at how many people couldn't even finish that portion. There were lifeguards all over rendering assistance. One race participant actually had a snorkel, mask and flippers and he was allowed to compete. Everyone got a medal once the race was over. It's like this is the special olympics or something.
Yesterday I got pulled over for the fourth time in my sixteen years of driving. 59 in a 45 outside of Burlington. I've always made it a policy to be friendly to cops and to not make any excuses and I think it has worked out for me:
1. 40 in a 25 with a learner's license (I was 15). Let go.
2. 39 in a 25. Ticket.
3. Taillight out. Warning.
4. 59 in a 45. Let go.
I'm sure there are other factors involved but it never hurts to be friendly in life.
1. 40 in a 25 with a learner's license (I was 15). Let go.
2. 39 in a 25. Ticket.
3. Taillight out. Warning.
4. 59 in a 45. Let go.
I'm sure there are other factors involved but it never hurts to be friendly in life.
Saturday, April 08, 2006
Once again the gas prices are shooting back up. I'm sure we'll be back over $3 by summertime. I remember it wasn't so many years ago that gas fluctuated 1 cent every couple weeks. Now it can go up 20 cents in one day. I think a big part of the problem is the growth of the SUV market. I think the other half of the problem is China. I'll start with the first:
We've all become addicted to the SUV. I have a Nissan Pathfinder myself. When my wife bought the car 4 years ago, she wanted it because of all the obvious reasons: looked cool, enjoyed sitting up higher, more space etc. If I was in the same boat today, I wouldn't buy another SUV, not with gas prices going the way they are. My concern is that people don't really care much for the greater good. Everyone looks to fulfill their own personal greed. Take a coworker of mine. He has a company pickup truck that he can use for personal use. Despite this he went out and bought a bigger pickup truck for himself and a giant Ford Excursion for his wife. Their reasons boiled down to the same reasons above: the vehicles looked cool. Meanwhile they are burning considerably more fuel as a result of this vanity. My solution to the problem is simple: tie your yearly vehicle registration to your vehicle's fuel economy. The government could take the average of your vehicle's city versus highway mileage and that would be your number. Then they would set an ideal number. For every mile per gallon less, your yearly fee would go up a fixed amount. So a Prius might cost you $50/year and an Excursion might cost you $300. Exceptions would be made for business related heavy vehicles. This seems to me to be a natural step in the right direction. If people want a large SUV, they are entitled to buy one but if they are going to affect the price of gas for the rest of us, then they should have to pay up. Of course, a large portion of the population would not want to pay the extra money and as a result they'd switch over to a more fuel effecient vehicle. This would then pressure the auto makers to make more fuel effecient vehicles and hopefully this trend of increasing gas prices would reverse itself.
Part two is China. I've often felt that we have two extremes in America now - things are either too cheap or too expensive. I don't think anyone will argue that $3.25 a gallon is expensive, health care is expensive, heating your home is expensive etc., but what about the flipside?
14 years ago I decided to buy a VCR to use in my college dorm. I researched around and picked out a reliable, middle-range unit that cost $300. At the time I was making $5/hour so it took me quite awhile to save up the money but despite that, I felt the $300 was a fair price.
I currently have a coworker who makes about $50,000/year. His wife does not work. He has three young children and three big dogs. In his house he has 5 TV's and 5 DVD players. Why is this? Because you can get a DVD player for $29. Even a good one costs about $100. If DVD players were $300, he'd have two at best. My point is this, some things have gotten too cheap. As a result we've fattened ourselves with piles of material items we don't really need just because of the price. The only catch is there is a cost to all this. As China gets richer from making all our goods, their 1 billion citizens go from riding bicycles to scooters and from scooters to cars. They're sucking up all the gas that was meant for us and as a result, our gas prices go up and fluctuate incredibly. Instead of celebrating how you bought this new button down shirt for $3, instead think about the hidden cost to our society. America's consumerism has gotten too fat and we will pay from it in the future. My solution to this problem is import taxes. No one wants more taxes but sometimes you have to look at the big picture. Pigs get fed, hogs get slaughtered.
We've all become addicted to the SUV. I have a Nissan Pathfinder myself. When my wife bought the car 4 years ago, she wanted it because of all the obvious reasons: looked cool, enjoyed sitting up higher, more space etc. If I was in the same boat today, I wouldn't buy another SUV, not with gas prices going the way they are. My concern is that people don't really care much for the greater good. Everyone looks to fulfill their own personal greed. Take a coworker of mine. He has a company pickup truck that he can use for personal use. Despite this he went out and bought a bigger pickup truck for himself and a giant Ford Excursion for his wife. Their reasons boiled down to the same reasons above: the vehicles looked cool. Meanwhile they are burning considerably more fuel as a result of this vanity. My solution to the problem is simple: tie your yearly vehicle registration to your vehicle's fuel economy. The government could take the average of your vehicle's city versus highway mileage and that would be your number. Then they would set an ideal number. For every mile per gallon less, your yearly fee would go up a fixed amount. So a Prius might cost you $50/year and an Excursion might cost you $300. Exceptions would be made for business related heavy vehicles. This seems to me to be a natural step in the right direction. If people want a large SUV, they are entitled to buy one but if they are going to affect the price of gas for the rest of us, then they should have to pay up. Of course, a large portion of the population would not want to pay the extra money and as a result they'd switch over to a more fuel effecient vehicle. This would then pressure the auto makers to make more fuel effecient vehicles and hopefully this trend of increasing gas prices would reverse itself.
Part two is China. I've often felt that we have two extremes in America now - things are either too cheap or too expensive. I don't think anyone will argue that $3.25 a gallon is expensive, health care is expensive, heating your home is expensive etc., but what about the flipside?
14 years ago I decided to buy a VCR to use in my college dorm. I researched around and picked out a reliable, middle-range unit that cost $300. At the time I was making $5/hour so it took me quite awhile to save up the money but despite that, I felt the $300 was a fair price.
I currently have a coworker who makes about $50,000/year. His wife does not work. He has three young children and three big dogs. In his house he has 5 TV's and 5 DVD players. Why is this? Because you can get a DVD player for $29. Even a good one costs about $100. If DVD players were $300, he'd have two at best. My point is this, some things have gotten too cheap. As a result we've fattened ourselves with piles of material items we don't really need just because of the price. The only catch is there is a cost to all this. As China gets richer from making all our goods, their 1 billion citizens go from riding bicycles to scooters and from scooters to cars. They're sucking up all the gas that was meant for us and as a result, our gas prices go up and fluctuate incredibly. Instead of celebrating how you bought this new button down shirt for $3, instead think about the hidden cost to our society. America's consumerism has gotten too fat and we will pay from it in the future. My solution to this problem is import taxes. No one wants more taxes but sometimes you have to look at the big picture. Pigs get fed, hogs get slaughtered.
I've been to 4 different chain sub sandwich restaurants and I'll rank them from my personal, best to worst as far as quality:
1. Potbelly's
2. Quizno's
3. Cousins
4. Subway
Most people would suspect that I would avoid Subway because of the lesser quality however after tonight I'm choosing to avoid Quizno's and it's not because the sandwiches don't taste good, it's because of the ridiculously high price they charge for a chain restaurant sub. Tonight I was looking for a cheap fast food dinner. I ordered a regular Italian classic - $6.00. That's just for the sandwich - no chips, no soda, no cookie. Am I the only one who thinks that's about $2 too expensive for a fast food sub sandwich? By comparison, Friday night I went to my favorite local Italian restaurant - Tenuta's in Bay View. There I ordered a fantastic meatball sandwich. It came with onion rings and complimentary freshly baked bread with dipping oil. The price - $6.00.
1. Potbelly's
2. Quizno's
3. Cousins
4. Subway
Most people would suspect that I would avoid Subway because of the lesser quality however after tonight I'm choosing to avoid Quizno's and it's not because the sandwiches don't taste good, it's because of the ridiculously high price they charge for a chain restaurant sub. Tonight I was looking for a cheap fast food dinner. I ordered a regular Italian classic - $6.00. That's just for the sandwich - no chips, no soda, no cookie. Am I the only one who thinks that's about $2 too expensive for a fast food sub sandwich? By comparison, Friday night I went to my favorite local Italian restaurant - Tenuta's in Bay View. There I ordered a fantastic meatball sandwich. It came with onion rings and complimentary freshly baked bread with dipping oil. The price - $6.00.